The war in
Syria also is within words in the medias, as the diplomatic activity in search
for the possible Geneva II agreement is still in sight, according at least to
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, as for the US Secretary of State, John
Kerry at the last meeting in Washington last 9th of August. Nonetheless
neither of the parts could actually agree on a fixed time and place, in which
to organize the summit. As for John Kerry, who said that the commitment of the
Syrian Opposition to attend the Swiss summit was clear, there was this
condition, that a transitional government was established, with no place for
the current Syrian president Bashar
Al-Assad. On his side, Lavrov stated that the Syrian government was determined to
attend the summit without preconditions. Still there were statements of the
Prime Minister, in which it was said, that no sovereignty was given into
consideration, in response to one of the demands of the opposition asking a
transitional government.
In the next
week a bilateral meeting will take place at The Hague, Netherlands, where the
Russian Foreign Deputy Vice minister Guennadi Gatilov and Wendy Sherman, the US
Undersecretary of State will be treating the technical aspects of the Summit,
as for ratifying the reached agreement. The actual relations of both Foreign
Ministers are by far more productive, than those on the presidential level, as
Barack Obama has had a mixed result in his last meeting in Northern Ireland for
the past G8 meeting.
Meanwhile
the Saudi monarchy has been deploying its influence in the region, reaching to
open a corridor for weapons and money supply through Jordan, an action to which
the government of Amman was openly was opposed to. Still the transit through
the common borderline is more than active, maintaining thus a vital and
essential supply line to the Syrian opposition, after the town of Quassyr was taken back by the regular forces of
Syria, interrupting directly the transit to Lebanon. Also stands the fact that
outskirts of Aleppo are being taken back
by the Syrian government in recent weeks.
The main
obstacle, as it seems in this major split inside the Syrian society, is due to
the fact, that probably the length of time has radicalized the positions to a
point of no return. In this way the government will not cease to face the terrorist organizations with all means
in his power, to recover the unity and peace in his country, as the opposition
refuses to deal with the Assad regime, and looks forward for a totally new
government. The question which remains, above any certainty expressed by the
Arab League representative, Lahdar
Brahimi, and many other spokesmen in this chain of events, if the two factions
opposed, could ever consider to implement a cease-fire. This has been tried in
the past, with poor success, even if it appeared, as if the regime of Damascus
was being at bay, and calm ruled for few hours, not even days. Still, the war dynamic
was back into its former confrontation very soon.
The Syrian
Opposition has shown little unity on some specific terms, as if they could negotiate
face to face with Assad´s government. When in a strong moment, they seem very
willing to go to the negotiating table, but in times of drawback, they claim their
goal is to liberate the country, therefore, they won´t agree anymore. The
government has repeatedly shown its good will to go, always under the
assumption, that they are seen as an executive power, and being respected as
such. It is quite uncertain, how both aspirations and needs will be attended by
Brahimi and generally by the big powers in charge of the main round, Russia and
the USA.
The back bone of the support of each side has
evidently a superpower and geostrategic reasons for its existence. The USA and
the Western European countries, at least most of them, are eager to establish a
new order on Syrian soil. Their main reason to do such, resembling once again
to the old cold war style, being to conquer power, driven by the People´s will,
or at least on their behalf, but with a hidden agenda, of splitting once again
the former Ottoman Empire nearly 100 years after its collapse and fragmentation.
The all so celebrated new freedom waves of the Arab Revolution have somehow
lost a bit of their freshness. The troops are being attended in increasing number by foreign fighters, coming from al
the Arab world, and furthermore from European nations, but by belief Muslims.
This brings into the debate, the Syrian national compound of the Free Syrian
Army, which at the most is composed by a minority of Syrians. Their dependency
on foreign help makes them quite helpless, when the supply lines fail. Still
their unity seems to rely on the non-definition of the future Syria to be built,
solely on the will of tumbling Assad from power. Therefore their statements
rarely are definitive or reliable on the long run, as they have changed
opinions several times, or simply failed to reach an agreement from within.
The president
Bashar Al-Assad has then again shown a good will of resistance, as worse times
than today have been in his two years struggle to recover the integrity of his
nation. Despite the relative isolation, his position has been kept, and
furthermore has recovered some places lost in the past to the opposition. Still
the economy has passed entirely to a war modus, as business as usual gets more
and more difficult to be done. He has
had to ask for a credit to Russia, as well as orders of weapons, as the turmoil
is being stretched in time.
The deadlock
remains as it was, while the hope on the Geneva II Agreement dwells away the
longer it is postponed. Until then, every party in this civil war will stay on his position, waiting for the other to make a move. This chess game could
last very long, only time will tell.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario